C&C with C&A

Tags

DIY, fun

What a week of fun!!  Cooking and Crafting with Connie and Angie.

I am feeling so lucky in many of the new friends we have up here in the North Woods and two of the best are Connie and Angie.  Luckily for me, Connie lives close enough that we’re talking about biking to each other’s homes… once summer comes ’round again!  And even though Angie is farther away, she has cute bunnies and goats and the best cat ever, Helga, so I get there too.  Both of these ladies have something that I do not… a real kitchen with stoves, ovens, running water that doesn’t go into a bucket. 😀

But the other thing they have is a love of crafts.  We started the crafting venture with Wire-wrapped Pendants and now we’re on to Driftwood Art, which uses some of the same techniques.  While Connie focused more on the bead creations aspect, Angie and I both made a Driftwood piece.  And we all chatted and chillaxed and created.  Here’s our work: Angie’s, mine and two for Connie.

So much fun!  I am loving this creative outlet.  It is amazing to see where it all goes as it’s a natural process and came sometimes turn out different than you expect.

So this was the second day this week for creation at Connie’s as she and I had done cooking too.  We worked on a few Gluten Free (GF) recipes and had good luck with all though we thought we’d only had luck with about half.  So, we started with a GF Beet Chocolate Cake… I KNOW!  It sounds weird.  But it’s really good.  I wasn’t sure but I really ended up liking it a lot.  Even Danny liked it!  So.  One success.

We had some weirdness along the way like a hard boiled egg in with the regular ones.  But we tried three different cracker recipes with mixed results.  The Sesame Seed crackers were the best of the three – nice and flaky, crunchy and tasty.  The Corn Puffs did not really puff – and while these were the third favorite, they were too salty.  This lead to several ideas on how we could improve on the recipe and we plan to implement three of those ideas by making a few more batches for the Super Bowl Feast.  The least workable was an Almond Flour Flax Seed cracker which we didn’t use Almond Flour to make.  Yeah, maybe most of the problem.  The substitution flours were likely too absorbant and we ended up with a VERY crisp cracker.  Too dry.  But the spice blend was good and Dan declared them “good”.  So, we can claim 4 victories… of sorts!

We’ve got lots of crafting and cooking plans so I’ll keep you posted if we have more fantastic adventures to share with you all.  Hope you are having your own successful creative endeavors as well.

Advertisement

Montreal Cognitive Assessment as a Qualification to be President

Tags

45

With many questioning his mental stability, intelligence, and health, GOP Leader 45 recently underwent his first annual physical, given by Navy Rear Admiral Dr. Ronny Johnson*.  And the results were… well, a bit questionable.

We’ve seen many memes regarding his height and weight but we have failed to discuss the details and their ramifications. The fact that he’s only gained 3# since his last assessment (by his personal doctor in September, 2016) seems to defy the weight he appears to have gained during his first year in the White House.  But the even bigger surprise is that he GREW AN INCH in the same time frame!!  In January 2017 he was 6’2”. But NOW he’s 6’3”!! Now that is gravity defying!

I think the most amazing report in his assessment  is his fasting glucose.  I find it hard to believe he is at 89 when he is constantly eating McDonald’s.  However, if it’s true, we might want to pull him for critical study to determine what chemical in his blood allows this to occur.  It could save America by Making us Less Diabetes Prone Again.

Though I am also surprised by the cardiac performance demonstrating “above average exercise capacity” for a person of his age.  I’m wondering if he did the chemical stress test as opposed to the treadmill test.  I’ve heard people say it’s easier.  I just can’t imagine a guy who had to take a golf cart last year during his time in Europe being “above average” in exercise capacity.  Remember when he pushed that other world leader out of the way because he was later on arrival for the cameras?  Not the leader of the pack by any definition.

Some experts have “weighed” in…   And they give some pretty good photos with which to compare 45 to others in the same height range.   It’s uncanny how he can make himself look shorter than people who are reportedly shorter than him!  Must be a talent only a Stable Genius has.  Oh, along those lines, Eugene Robinson has written a lovely letter to 45 on this topic.

I think if we really want to see a “stable genius”, it’s this kid… and he knows how to use a button.

What I haven’t seen is much outpouring of concern over his mental assessment.  With all the concerns being expressed of late, hearing he had a “perfect score” on his cognitive assessment was confusing.  So, we at the Gaither Place decided to do some research.  We wondered what exactly the questions were on this mental assessment and we found it!  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment:

Doc Ronny Johnson noted that 45 did “exceedingly well” on this assessment.  But is this truly meaningful?  I mean, if a second grader got a 30/30 score I might be impressed.  But really, every grown adult who is free from Severe Mental Retardation, Dementia, or Alzheimer’s should be able to easily answer these questions correctly.  And should we be concerned that the part we (ok, I) mostly expected him to fail is not worth any points?

The foreign press says his exam did not include a psychiatric evaluation.  Well, the Daily Mail is fake news, of course!  But the Guardian did not expect news of his mental acuity to be shared.  And were they right?  Was all the reporting on his evaluation modified?  Possibly for National Security reasons?

Should We the People have concerns due to the fact that the White House Physician is selected by the President?  Though Ronny was selected by G.W. Bush, and appointed by Obama, are his loyalties truly with us, the American People?  Or is he somehow guided, heck even directed, by the National Security Administration or the Department of Homeland Security?  Why would they lie to us?  Why would there be any cover up of what their responsibilities are in the process of the Annual Physical for the President?

Which brings us to the Super Bowl…  “What?”  Yes. The Super Bowl.

One of the interesting news bits of late in Minnesota is concern over whether the Federal operatives will push out the Minneapolis Police Department – there was a recent blurb on MPR but I can’t find it, though I did find this article that notes: “The Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) is the lead agency for security at this year’s Super Bowl, and they are being supported by an impressive team that includes dozens of local police departments and public safety organizations, along with federal agencies including the FBI and multiple components of the Department of Homeland Security.”

However, our experience in Indy for Super Bowl XLVI indicated DHS was truly in charge.  The DHS built a Command Center in Indy [a “gift to the city” that was so poorly built it was falling apart a year later] in which camera monitoring and security oversight took place.  While they may say local officials are in charge, the fact is that if anything happens, DHS will be running the show. As they probably already are.

Why should we believe there is any difference in what they say about the Super Bowl security and the information they provide on 45’s physical? They are really only telling us what they want us to hear.

The good news for Mikey Pence is that they have told us some things that could work out well for him.  With a declaration of 45’s cholesterol issues, the plan for taking him out in a year or two can now go unquestioned.  They can reasonably claim, “It was a bad ticker!”  Then Pence can get a short term, to finish out The Don’s first term, and then still be eligible for 2 more terms!!  They just have to be sure to keep him alive long enough to get to that point where it won’t make Pence ineligible for that third term in the Executive branch.  And how long is that?  Well, here’s a meme that gives you a hint.

Imagine if next year we see:

1/20/2017 Trump Inaugurated

1/20/2018 Government Shutdown

1/20/2019 Trump in Critical Condition after Heart Attack

Then we could see 10 years of Mr. P.  [Or, if they take him out before then, whoever fills Paul Ryan’s post.]  You see, the Twenty-Second Amendment says a person can only be elected to be president two times for a total of eight years. However, if said person (typically a Vice-President) takes over for a president who can no longer be President and serves two years or less of the last President’s term, he or she may serve for two full four-year terms.

Now that is something to ponder.

* Dr. Johnson… and he’s a Rear Admiral!!  Think about it… You can’t make this shit up!

Image Credits:

• Stable Boy with a Button

• Running the Government Like his Business

Another Step in the Line 3 Fight

Tags

Line 3

So it looks to me like Enbridge and their partners didn’t gain much by their recent machinations. As I spent time watching the entire January 9^th Public Utilities Commission Special Meeting, I thought I’d share the details.

Aside:  Maybe I should have done a summary earlier, but hopefully it will be helpful to those of you who have not followed these events as closely as some of us locals have done, to see the following.

As you may recall, the entire reason an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is being done is due to the suit by Friends of the Headwaters (FOH) that questioned the process the State of Minnesota was using to handle the Applications for Certificate of Need and Route Permits by Enbridge for what they refer to as their Line 3 Replacement (but that is actually a NEW pipeline in a NEW corridor, much of which lies in wetlands and lakes areas previously untouched by Tar Sands pipelines).  There is an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) handling the case for FOH and she will issue a recommendation to the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) on whether or not to allow Enbridge to build this new Line 3 pipeline.  MPR did a brief story on this last September. You can read more about the FOH concerns, including lots of reports on the issues here.

Here is some further background (from the briefing papers for the Special Meeting):

On August 29^th, the ALJ issued, based on a planned early December PUC decision on the Adequacy of the Final EIS, the following post-hearing briefing schedule:

On 11/1/17, Judge Lipman deemed the FEIS “Adequate” and on 11/22, the ALJ issued a modified hearing schedule as follows:

However, on December 7^th, the PUC found that the EIS was “Not Adequate” citing four deficiencies that the Department of Commerce Energy Environmental Review and Analysis unit will need to redress before the EIS can be deemed “Adequate”.  As such, the EIS is yet to be a set document and will be updated with information on 1) how far and where an alternate route (SA-04) will need to move to avoid delicate topography along with a revised Environmental-Impact analysis reflecting this new location, 2) clarifications that quantitative representations do not necessarily reflect actual qualitative impacts, 3) identification of which resource impacts are additive (introducing new or additional impacts) beyond those already existing in a corridor, and 4) clarification that a Traditional Cultural Properties Survey is required before the start of any construction (if a permit is granted).

On December 14, Intervening Parties (FOH, Honor The Earth, multiple Tribal Bands, Northern Water Alliance of Minnesota, and Youth Climate Interveners) filed a joint motion to the ALJ requesting an adjustment of the Briefing Schedule pending a PUC determination of Adequacy on the EIS.  They argued that until the EIS is deemed Adequare, the Final EIS could change facts underlying issues of central importance in both the Certificate of Need and Route Permit matters making it impossible for them to brief their cases on the issue.

Enbridge, the United Association, the Laborers Council, and the Shippers rejected the need for said motion stating it was am unreasonable attempt at further delay and:

• Neither Minnesota Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) or Minnesota Rules require an “Adequate” EIS prior to post-hearing briefing being submitted to an ALJ.
• The purpose of an EIS is to inform the permitting authority (PUC), not to provide support for intervening parties legal arguments.

On 12/22, the ALJ issued a change in the schedule noting, among other things:

In her extension, she pushed some dates out by a couple weeks and some by a couple months.  However, the more extensive pushes appear to be a result of the fact that the Final EIS will not be available for a second determination of Adequacy until the end of February (as they were given 60 days to re-issue an EIS with the above mentioned remedies).

On December 28^th, Enbridge et al requested a Joint Motion to Certify the issue – basically asking the PUC to determine if this push of the schedule is justified or not.  A special meeting of the PUC was scheduled the next day, for January 9^th.  This new meeting would require additional resources be used to argue this specific push of dates (again, mostly affected by the EIS requiring revision), thus taking away from resources to address the ALJ decision.

[I guess I shouldn’t be too upset as Enbridge is paying for all this work being done on the EIS and such.  Of course, they will likely, should they not be issued their permit, sue the State of Minnesota for all their lost income in the fight that did not allow them to continue building pipelines as they wished.]

So what happened at the January 9^th Meeting?

It began with Jim Newberger (District 15B) making a statement on how we need these proceedings to move forward as quickly as possible as Minnesota needs the jobs.

Then opening arguments began, starting with Enbridge and their associates.

Kevin Prentice for Laborers Council, Sam Jackson for United Association, Mike Ahern for Shippers, and Eric Swanson for Enbridge.

Eric Swanson began noting the need to get the process back on track.  MEPA simply requires an EIS be determined adequate before permits and construction; it is for the use of the permitting authority, not for use by Interveners to prepare legal briefs. He requested parallel progress of permitting during EIS process as the EIS adequacy is NOT required for parties to submit briefs.  Delay means continued uncertainty – delayed jobs, economic stimulus, more integrity digs, higher costs.  He suggested Initial Briefs and Enbridge Proposed Findings by 1/23/18 (14 days), Reply Briefs and Proposed Findings by 2/23/18, ALJ report by 4/23/18 (typically 2 months), (8 weeks later) PUC hearing by 6/18/18.

Mike Ahern explained that Customers of Enbridge who have agreed to pay for what they ship through the mainline system have already been delayed.  They finalized agreements in February 2014 anticipating all approvals by July 2016, at which point the Shippers had a right to cancel their support but waived it due to a need for the project.  The effect of delays is further “apportionment” – rationing of pipeline capacity.  He noted chronic and frequent level of apportionment in the last few years and noted that apportionment is increasing. He requested a support of the Enbridge dates given today.

Sam Jackson represents welders and pipefitters and noted that delay means jobs, wages, tax revenue, and economic stimulus are all delayed.  Additionally, they may be faced with building in a different construction season if the pending delays occur, affecting future projects.

Kevin Prentice representing Laborers said that more than a year ago, the PUC showed deference to the proponents, in giving delays.  While respecting the legitimacy of PUC’s decision, if further delays are carried out, it indicates the MN Permitting process is broken.

So, the main message I see in the arguments from the above is this:

Since we all have this money and hope invested, we need to keep moving forward as quickly as possible!

It was time then for opening statements from the Interveners:

Scott Strand for FOH, Sara Van Norman for Fond du Lac Band, Joe Plummer for White Earth, Leili Fatehi for Sierra Club, Brent Mercia (Aquila Sanders-Reed /Sarah Harper) for Youth Climate Interveners, Joe Blackburn for Honor The Earth, and David Zoll for the Mille Lacs Band.

Joe Plummer of Red Lake and White Earth said he was sympathetic to their arguments but excess capacity is currently available.  Six pipelines exist and they are looking at building into a new corridor.  This REQUIRES extensive environmental surveys.  If anything they should be working with the process but instead they filed a motion resulting in a meeting announced on the last day of 2017 with no details of the agenda.  There was no way to easily prepare for this meeting.  Shippers are focused on exporting refined fuel but there is no need for this in Minnesota.  The delays they complain of are the required environmental needs for the project.

Leili Fatehi first took issue with Swanson’s characterization of MEPA.  Its purpose is to assure government agencies can look at environment and socio-economic issues AND that the public is apprised of the issues and details.  The statute provides for public interest considerations, not only for use of the information by a permitting authority.  MEPA is not designed to expedite for economic benefit of private entities, it is to protect the public and give government all needed information.  Normal PUC practice is that when parallel proceedings are happening or changes in circumstances (change in inadequacy) exist, schedules can change.  Both conditions exist now.  When the PUC joined the two items, they noted that the EIS gives parties information needed to proceed.  Saying the EIS is solely for the PUC undermines the purpose of the contested case hearing process.  It limits the ALJ and parties from having all needed information to proceed.  There is a far greater risk to due process than the risk a 3-month delay would bring to Enbridge’s process.  [Did I mention how impressed I am with this woman?? I believe I failed to do so in the last PUC blog.]

Sara Van Norman noted that this meeting being on the agenda creates an ongoing impact on being able to respond to the PUC’s other requirements.  There was no way to provide written comments in the last week and a half to provide information of the briefing schedule.  It was not clear this would even be allowed for discussion, giving no opportunity for analysis.  While it is understood that creating due process issues was not the PUC’s intent, she suggested pausing on the briefing schedule and instead reviewing other issues that would give better direction.

Brent from Youth Climate Interveners noted that procedurally they agreed with Sara.  While expressing that “we are not lawyers”, reading the notice, Enbridge’s request seemed to be not the briefing schedule but whether the ALJ’s decision should be certified.  This was not clear to the public or to the YCI.  Prentice talked about new procedural hurdles – but this is due process… FOLLOWING THE LAW.  Delays are their concern but concerns to water, climate and treaty rights are the concern on this side and more time to assure complete information is not a delay but instead is a more thorough process.  Best vehicle for additional information is the Final EIS, which, coming in February is not currently available, but will change the substance of the issue.  As intervenors, they should be allowed to respond with all evidence on a given record.  Requiring briefings prior to the information is available DOES NOT ALLOW for a complete argument.  Matters of consequence and significance need all information to be best decided.  MEPA is not just for the government agency but for the public.  The public is watching.  What do you want the public to see?  A PUC being pressured by Enbridge and Shippers (due to their frantic statements on “apportionment”)? Or that the PUC is listening to the public concerns about water and climate issues with this pipeline being constructed and carrying Tar Sands through our state? [I was so impressed with this young man’s presentation that I sent him an email acknowledging the hope he brings me.]

Scott Strand for FOH discussed the practicality. The decision to send back EIS for amendment means we will have more information to consider.  The Enbridge schedule would require briefs to already be submitted.  If SA-04 is given as a strong alternative, then Enbridge will want to dispute this and will want to supplement their briefing – and we would alternatively.  What ALJ has done is allow for more rapid movement because there won’t be re-design after the fact.  Given both the parties and the public understanding that this is not a check-the-box process, full consideration needs to be given to this matter.

David Zoll noted three items.  1) The 280-day deadline under MEPA has been satisfied as a decision has been made on the adequacy of the FEIS, though in the negative (12-7-17).  2) MEPA purpose 4410.2000 Subpart 1 https://www.revisor.mn.gov/rules/?id=4410.2000 is to provide info for governmental units… AND OTHER PERSONS  having concerns regarding environmental effects.  To be useful to intervenors to use in briefings it HAS TO BE AVAILABLE.  ALJ Ann O’Reilly is closest to the record and knows what is necessary for a complete report to be made. 3) Discussion regarding timing – three petitions for December order may affect timing; those decisions are still to be made and could change the timeline.  There has been a decision made by the ALJ which doesn’t presuppose when other things will be done.  It requires only that EIS is DONE and COMPLETE.  This means all other issues are irrelevant and won’t require more meetings/decisions/etc.    If Enbridge/DOC had done a better job on the FEIS, not preventing information from being included and such, this process would be moving forward.  Since this work was not robustly done, it does not mean we should now continue to push forward.

Mr. Blackburn stated that when PUC refers a matter to the contested process, it gives up their ability to control the schedule.  If PUC disagrees with ALJ and demands her to change her schedule, it is not lawful as they are not as close to the record as she is.  Since the ALJ provides a recommendation to the PUC, her analysis must conclude her decision WITH a complete EIS, otherwise it seems Enbridge is arguing that the EIS is just a box to check, not truly a requirement.

Following a break, Commissioner Lipshultz had a question for Enbridge.

Your idea of delaying the project assumes we will be approving the project.  Explain more about why delay is a problem beyond delaying an outcome you can’t predict.

Eric Swanson replied that continued uncertainty and straying from the process set in statute and rule would have effects only if approved.  Other impacts he agreed would only be felt if the project is not approved.  Commissioner Tuma then asked about where Enbridge was taking the PUC with regard to where they want to come in a decision.  He indicated there was no desire to be an arbiter for the ALJ.  He noted: It seems that Enbridge is suggesting that the PUC should tell the ALJ what her schedule should be.  Back in August 2017, we discussed the schedule and why it was going the way it did.  You stated in page 9 of your brief on your understanding of why we were doing what we were doing.  The “buffer zone” was allowing the PUC to get an adequate FEIS.

Swanson responded that he understood the schedule was an April 30^th date but now “we’re dealing with this NOT being the schedule.” He is sympathetic that the PUC should not get “in the weeds” of dictating to the ALJ; his specific request is to expeditiously certify the order to the commission on whether the schedule change was warranted.

Commissioner Tuma asked for clarification that that he was saying it was unwarranted to link the FEIS with the briefing schedule.  Swanson agreed this was his stance.

Commissioner Tuma noted: We decided we are not marrying the process.

David Zoll then explained that a decision on adequacy was to be done prior to the briefings being due.  However, he had no recollection of what we would do if adequacy was decided in the negative.

Commissioner Lange asked Enbridge (from page 9 comments – not sure what they kept referencing with this “page 9” deal…) about Enbridge and Co-petitioners discussion of the schedule.  A Waiver granted by Enbridge comports with orders.  Originally, there was a February ALJ decision due but the ALJ extended by a month to report by March.  Enbridge is now proposing to give the ALJ an additional 24 days.  One could argue that the PUC should go to the 3/30 date, no ambiguity of this, no waivering.  Why is 4/23 appropriate?

Swanson said they were “Just trying to react to the reality on the ground.” The ALJ told everyone to keep working but she did indefinitely extend the briefing schedule 10 days before briefings were due.  They took that information and decided a schedule that will work. Enbridge is “Not in a hurry.”

Commissioner Lipshultz then asked Zoll: There has never been an adequacy determination on an FEIS prior to the judge giving a report.  What’s different here?

Zoll noted it was Practice, not Precedent (which is binding).  The EIS being is prepared to the 4410 rules.  As noted at the August Meeting: Decision depends in part on an EIS, in it’s final form, available for the parties, for us to have a reliable record.  Can’t get around staging this in a way that has an EIS available for the parties to refer to in their testimony.  (12-21-15)  This is the PUC comment.  The EIS is not a formality, it is a basis for the arguments to be made before the Commission.  There would be sufficient time to use this EIS before the PUC.  A policy decision for this to be available is UNCHANGED.

Commissioner Lipshultz noted the debate was DEIS vs. FEIS available prior to testimony, Not Adequacy.  Inadequacy was defined as narrow and the full EIS is pretty complete.  What do you need more than what you have?  With 1 year of investigation, 3 rounds of testimony, 12 days of evidentiary hearings – what are you lacking?

Zoll:  We do have a voluminous EIS – tons of data – but it lacks synthesis and analysis in order for them to make arguments.  Fails to acknowledge difference between existing pipeline corridors and siting a pipeline in a greenfield.  NOT AVAILABLE in CURRENT FEIS. The EIS is not there only to collect info but to also SYNTHESIZE this information.  This is what parties and public are entitled to in order to make their decisions and arguments.  This is a matter of months.  Need to get this right and right the first time.

Lipshultz: You identify one inadequacy – to distinguish between greenfield and non-greenfield routes.  When you file your briefs, you know this.  Write the brief to address that the EIS understates the impact to greenfields, with more information to come.

Zoll: Cannot argue precisely the extent to which these are understated and why a route alternative is preferable to the applicant’s preferred route.  Could leave it for gaps to be completed later but this is not the correct approach.  Can argue what we THINK the information will say but no reason to prevent parties from having actual data.

Tuma directed Zoll to “Bring your witnesses on the greenfield issue. The DOC / FEIS is not your witness.”

Zoll: The EIS does not make the decision but it is required to have all the data and analysis available.  The EIS is still a moving target.  If it’s important for this information to be available to the parties per 4410.2000 and the December comment from PUC; it should be available.

There was more back and forth about the fact that the PUC did not want to “direct” the ALJ.  And finally, a Motion:

Request the ALJ to issue report by 4/23/18 and adjust her schedule to accommodate this date.

The ALJ can determine dates for filing briefs.  This 4/23 date allows more time for brief completion, and allows more time between initial and reply briefs.  There is no harm to parties with a 4/23 ALJ Report.  It gives the ALJ 60 days to come to her decision which, considering the scope of the issue, is necessary.

It would seem that if they are sincere about wanting a thorough and well-considered recommendation from the ALJ, that they will want to assure she and all parties have the full and complete EIS and enough time for a thorough review of the facts.  Unless they’ve already decided the final decision and this is merely a box-checking process. If they are willing to dismiss the ALJ on a decision about the dates in the schedule, are they going to be just as willing to ignore her final decision if it says to NOT permit the pipeline application?

Commissioner Seben noted this was a “Fair hearing” with allowance of all to be heard, which follows due process.  She admonished that… Indicating there is corruption undermines the process.

Unless the PUC process IS corrupt… in which case, we are merely making it evident with a full review of the details.  And that IS in the public’s best interest.

Happy Birthday, Baby!

Well, it’s that time of year again… time for resolutions.  And, time for Dan’s birthday!

In the past, he would get for his birthday whatever he didn’t get for Christmas a few weeks earlier.  The joys of a January birthday!  But this year there wasn’t really much we wanted or needed for Christmas.  So there’s not really anything to get him for his birthday.  The will be a small gift arriving – hopefully in time!  But regardless, I think he’s pretty happy just to be married to me, living in the Harn, and enjoying life these days.

And I’m happy with him.  He’s a pretty amazing person.  He knows history and is always informing me of  some aspect (often something of which I am oblivious) that puts current events in a new perspective.   He is really thoughtful and it’s a hopeless battle to try to give him a more well-thought gift than he will give you (I’ve completely given up on trying).  He makes me laugh – a lot.  And his biggest goal in life is to be sure I’m happy. It doesn’t get much better than this in a partner!  So I hope he has a Happy Birthday and a Wonderful Year.

But to resolutions…

There is some school of thought that says we shouldn’t all be making resolutions on the first  day of the year.  Some believe we should make them on OUR birthday – our personal “new year”.  So if you’re a New Year’s Baby, that’s YOUR day,  But the rest of us can wait a while longer to focus on the idea of resolution.  I find some truth in this.  I did such a birthday resolution thing a few years back and, as I remember, it was quite successful.  Anyway, it seems so much pressure to make New Year’s resolutions… but I guess that way we have lots of company about January 19th when we realize we have not stuck with the plan!  I realized a few years back how big this resolution thing is when my Yoga classes were overflowing the first two weeks of January.  A few weeks in and we were back to the usual suspects.

I have been contemplating this idea of resolutions and making commitments to improve our lives in some way.  And I don’t think a once a year attack is really productive. What I’m realizing is, I need to work daily on just being the best me I can be.  And accepting that I will fall short… I will forget and lose focus.  And I need to make the efforts when the thoughts arise.  I guess I’m feeling like it’s more of a follow the gut or listen to the heart thing.

So what have Dan & I been working to do of late?

• We attended a friend’s “Let’s Watch X-Files” party.  It’s all about improving social skills and having fun! Hey, resolution can’t be just about losing 10#!  [Note: Jeff and I were not very well behaved in that we kept making jokes and such! So you might not want to invite us if you are serious about your TV party…]  We decided that the Nova special on the Hubble that followed was much more interesting and exciting.  Is it just me or is the new X-Files just really jumpy, drawn out without a lot of anything happening, and full of horrible acting?  I remember the original show being much more sharply presented, exciting, and fun.  We decided to cancel the remainder of our X-Files Party plans.
• We invited a buddy who’s going through a major life change over to dinner.  And I sent him home with leftovers to assure he’d have one less thing to figure out when lunch rolled around the next day.
• We answered the call for help from the Alida Country Store owner who is preparing to re-open the store (just around the corner), hopefully by summer. It’s usually a quick job that he just can’t manage single handed and since we’re so close, it’s easy to run over and lend a hand when he needs it.  I really enjoy helping with the project and I’m excited for the  possibilities.  And good deeds always seem to bring blessings in return.  We’re now using the wood splitter that helped us prep wood at the store to prep wood here at the Harn.  Saved us going all the way to Solway to rent a splitter.  And, when we return it, we can visit with his momma!
• I’ve been trying to get out and visit with neighbors – though this is something I have to work to do… as extroverted as I am, I often would rather just stay home and read or craft.  Luckily for me, I have a bit of a reprieve as the Queen of Alida (89 year old gal who lives smack in the center of town) will be away for a while.  Maybe if it warms up I’ll find it easier to get those check-ins with the neighbors done!

On the other hand, as many of us find in living, I’ve had many occasions to see the downside of my ways.  These awareness raising events and situations help me to realize exactly where I might need to work on being more compassionate or helpful.  I continue to struggle with being the best person I can be.  But this year, no formal resolutions for me.  Just continuing in my commitment to daily try to be aware of what I might do to help make the world a better place.

I wish you all the best on your own journey through this thing called Life.

Happy 2018!

Photo Credit: https://www.birthdaywishes.expert/top-100-original-and-funny-happy-birthday-memes/

Water Issues

Tags

DIY

Once again, water has gotten the better of us this winter at the Harn.  Not as tragic as it was last year with the busted cistern.  Not as tragic as it could have been.  But a bit of work nonetheless.  As usual though, there is also a silver lining.

We had a lovely evening Christmas Eve dinner with neighbors Bill and Connie and farmer friends Jeff and Angie.  Dinner included a scrumptious ham, perfectly basted by the first couple and lovingly raised by the latter.  We brought mashed potatoes and cornbread.  Angie brought beets and carrots and a beautiful braided Christmas bread.  Connie made yummy Pilgrim Pumpkin Custard for dessert.  We stuffed ourselves and headed home for a warm winter’s nap.  When we awoke Christmas morning, we did the usual stuff and eventually turned on the tap… only to find it was frozen.  Bummer!

We put a space heater in the corner cabinet where the pipes run and… nothing. We decided to clear all the crafting stuff (a 6’ high pile of boxes in the corner) and put a space heater there.  Ran it all night and, about 11:30 the next morning, we had flow.

I did some dishes to clear the lines and we kept checking the tap through the day.  We contemplated all day what we might have to do.  We knew it was not feasible to run space heaters like that all the time. We ran the heater overnight as it was to be even colder than the previous but I decided at bedtime that we could turn it down to 64 instead of 72… to use a bit less energy.  Not a good idea.  We woke up the next day to frozen pipes again! [Pretty sure I drive Dan crazy with my “saving” plans.]

This second night in a row of freezing let us know we really needed to take out the wall to look at the pipes and see what could be done to mitigate the issue.  The next day, we got to work.  We pulled all the trim and removed the tougue-in-groove.  We knew the lines ran along the east exterior wall of the Harn but once we opened up the wall, we found another issue. There was cold air in the wall.

Our walls are basically steel exterior, then insulation batting and a layer of 4 mil plastic in the studs, then tongue-in-groove pine boards.  There is a stub wall between the kitchen area and the craft area and it is in this stub wall that the kitchen lines run from the west side of the Harn to the kitchen area.  Since we put electrical outlets in this stub wall, there is a wire that runs from the exterior wall, through the plastic and into the stub wall. This wire happened to enter the wall, just where the 90° bend for the water lines (with brass fittings) took a turn to the kitchen sink.  And there, a hole in the plastic was creating a jet of cold air right at that bend in the pipe.

First Dan taped the hole to stop the cold air jet.  I was glad he did as a short while later I saw a large mouse run into the gap in the wall.  He was under the plastic and I touched him telling him to get on out of there.  We then pulled the water lines off the exterior wall and stapled them to the next stud over.  We added a piece of foam board between the exterior stud and the bend in the water pipes and added insulation in the studs at this location.  We covered the water lines with insulation and tied the hot and cold lines together higher up with a second piece of tube insulation.  Then we also stuffed fiber insulation around the lines where it was still exposed.  We decided we didn’t need to heat tape the lines but we did cut the tongue-in-groove to allow for access to the area, should we need it again.  Let’s hope that does NOT happen!

Before we put things back together, we also ran a new 20-amp line down into the stub wall to allow for the addition of a couple more outlets – since I had been cooking on that side of the kitchen as a habit. And, knowing me, Dan gave me a 6-plug outlet!  Now I can cook AND do crafts at the same time. AND Dan is going to add two new shelves for me on that wall, since I moved the tall cabinet from that corner to the opposite one in the craft area.  On the opposite side of the stud wall, I’m also getting that high kitchen shelf I’ve wanted.

We realized after the wall was apart and everything in the craft room had been piled to the side, that we might have company over the New Year’s weekend… so we scampered to clear clutter and get things put back together.  And, while digging through craft boxes to determine what could go to the storage area, I found a small Mary Engelbreit shelf that Mom had made me that fit the bill for a small kitchen shelf we planned for the new cooking area we had created a couple weeks back.

 

So things are shaping up pretty good!  We’re keeping warmer now and the pipes are in good shape!  The weather has been cold as ever and no more frozen tap in the morning.

Hope our New Year flows easily.  And we hope yours does too.